In Part One, we noted that the shafts and particularly their angles were of primary importance in the plan and construction of the Great Pyramid. With the mantle in place, the Great Pyramid could be seen from the mountains in Israel and probably the moon as … . What if we now add the values of these four angles together? that the Great Pyramid incorporates a fraction of a geographical degree. "Using Petrie's measures – that is mean height of KC, base height from ground level we compute that the middle of KC's height from ground level is: [(1923.7"+1921.6")/2 + 1692.8"]/2 = 87.7005 rc. 11.99º subtract 11.73º = 0.26º – again, a quarter of a degree difference. . Egyptologists say the Great Pyramid was constructed during the 4th Dynasty period, between 2,500 and 2,400 BC. We find that the extended red lines on which the King's Chamber is centred now represent the squared Ecliptic Plane and the Ecliptic Pole. After all, that's what we were taught in school and far too many of us have accepted that explanation and have not concerned ourselves to think about the subject again. . > The Great Pyramid is a scale model of Earth, at a ratio of 1:43,200 (a significant number) No, it's not. 20º. We are content that the angles from each of the three points and each to the centres of the two chambers are well within the correct "ball-park" – in that they do indeed correlate and present us with meaning. 6), which is 20.614 inches, or 1.71784777 feet, and which rounds-off to 1.718 feet – an expression of. . After all, that's what we were taught in school and far too many of us have accepted that explanation and have not concerned ourselves to think about the subject again. As revealed in Part One, the 6.5º 'mean difference' between the upper and lower sets of shafts, if targeting the same two stars at different times, appears to suggest an Earth axial shift of 6.5 degrees in remote antiquity. Again, compared to Spiros' value of 6.24º this gives a discrepancy of 0.22º – within one quarter of a degree. 441/440 is an important ratio due the Earth’s spin deforming it from spherical, reducing the Earth’s polar radius and expanding its equatorial radius, to make the mean radius of the Earth 441/440 of the polar radius. Under the tremendous weight of numerous contradicting factors, this explanation remains wanting and many are now challenging this view. 2. by Robert Bauval and Jean-Paul Bauval, March 7, 2017. by William R. Fix, (Smithmark, 1978), p. 27. We have to set tolerances, and given the enormous size of the pyramid, if the true value of the angles from each of the three points to the chambers are within less than half a degree of the geophysical angles that relate to us today as well as the angles relating to the era of the 4th dynasty, then we know that there is indeed something to all of this, and this is indeed what we find. “The great pyramid encodes the dimensions of our planet on the precessional scale of 1:43,200. . However, what would be the point of this encoded, geophysical picture for people who already know it? . With due respect, this person clearly didn't understand the simplicity of what is being expressed here because as we can see, the four values with which we began and which we see illustrated in Fig. Again, this alignment which illustrates that the upper shafts are offset by 6.5º from the apex as well as those of the lower shafts, further verifies the 'mean difference' of approximately 6.5 degrees in the angles of the upper and lower star shafts. In any case, there is a good reason why this perpendicular angle of 23.5º would have to exist and be present within these alignments, and this is because it completes the geophysical picture encoded within the geometry of the Great Pyramid, a picture we are yet to reveal. Looking at this another way, it is a fact that with the Great Pyramid at 30ºN, the daily cycle of its 6.5º to53.5º distances from the Ecliptic Plane actually depends on the 23.5º obliquity of the polar axis. It appears that the number of Course Levels from the base of the GP to the floors of the chambers actually reflect the degree values of these angles, as revealed briefly in Fig 8, and as we will see, the addition of this particular angle presents further evidence for this: South Vertice to centre of King's Chamber . To put it another way, half of one minute of arc measure at the latitude of the equator is virtually the same as the perimeter of the base of the Great Pyramid.”, L.C. . Pyramids and monuments represent solar system objects displayed at that scale. 26.3º = 76.3º. In cross-section, the pyramid becomes a triangle with only three points: To demonstrate these findings we will now begin with the simple East-West cross-section diagram of the GP complete with shafts and their vertices as shown in Part One: As revealed in Part One, we know that the King's Chamber shafts are offset from the Queen's Chamber shafts to the south by some 6.5 degrees and from the apex, and so it is from the apex that we will plot this same angle and towards the south. Naturally, we would be looking for angles with the same geodetic/GP-locale-related values as we see in fig. The correlating values of the angles found within the GP match by one third of a degree, the geophysical condition of the Earth as we know it today as referenced by the GP's location on the earth, and after all, it is through this geophysical data that we recognise and identify the connection here. You will find that when you superimpose the two diagrams together via the centre of the earth and the centre of the King's Chamber, the geodetic angles relating to the Earth in respect of its orbit around the sun and the angle geometry of the GP, will match perfectly (providing the sizes of the two images are relative to this match) and it's an amazing thing that they do because if this is by chance then the odds against this are enormous. One would suspect that the angle would also be 23.5º and perpendicular with the 23.5º angle that intersects the King's Chamber. "You can get any number out of the pyramid by choosing random points". The distance that can be seen until the curvature of the earth gets in the way is: D = √ (7 x H)/4 = √ (7 x 475)/4 = 28.8 miles! If we now extend the lines of the cross on which the King's Chamber is centred (see Fig. Pavement height of 0.5236 meters (1 royal cubit) + height of 146.608 meters (280 royal cubits) = 147.1316 meters (281 royal cubits). After everything else we have seen, this is an alignment that could only be expected as it completes the geophysical picture of the Earth and its orbital dynamics. By chance these angles could have crossed each other anywhere within the vast internal dimension of the GP, but they intersect at the centre of the King's Chamber. But seriously, would anyone now question the intent of the architects to orient the Great Pyramid to the four points of the compass (its entrance face aligned with true north) because it is out by 3 arc minutes? (See Fig. 11.75º, Apex to Centre of King's Chamber . However, as mentioned, the obliquity angle of 23.5º is popularly used as a general figure and so for many it's one that is instantly recognised. In fact the difference is only 0.28º – within a third of a degree. . The weight of the pyramid is estimated at 5,955,000 tons. It is the only surviving wonder of the ancient world and has inspired endless speculation as to how it was built and what purpose it served. . If this isn't a coincidence then we would have to ask why two precessional cycles? Using sand, water, and a scale model of an ancient Egyptian transport sled, a team of international scientists have answered an enduring question: “How on Earth were the pyramids of Egypt built?” The ancient Egyptians utilized neither wheels nor work animals for the majority of the pyramid-building era, so the giant blocks, weighing 2.5 tons on average, had to be moved through human … The KC center-GP apex angle based on Petrie measures is 6.242 degrees. We can certainly live with these more precise values as calculated by Spiros – as they work just as well. If we take the height of the great pyramid and multiple it by 43,200 we get the Earth´s polar radius. This is Ancient Freemasonry (1919) by Frank C. Higgins. . One degree of LATITUDE at the equator (being the distance from the equator to one-degree north) is 110,574.2727 meters. 23.789º + 11.732º + 11.732º + 6.242º = 53.495º . is equal to one-half ‘arc minute’ of the equatorial circumference of the Earth. and 30º. 1 . The apparent height of the 481 foot tall (Hobj) pyramid for someone who is 6 feet tall (Heye) is 475 feet (Hobj - Heye). . Using the precise angles as calculated by Spiros . Spiros' value is 6.24º – a discrepancy of only 0.02º – which is less than the 3 arc-minute discrepancy of the GP's alignment to the four points of the compass. . The Great Pyramid as Geometric Model of The Earth - YouTube . Its location is actually 29º 58' 51" N in arc hours and minutes, and in degrees the location is 29.98º – just 2,125 metres short of exactly 30 degrees north latitude. The annual seasons result from the fact that the Earth is tilted some 23.5 degrees in respect of the plane of the Earth's orbit around the sun – known as the Plane of the Ecliptic. After this one would endeavour to obtain more precise values for these angles and would eventually get more-or-less the same results we are presenting here: but given the size of the Great Pyramid, and the enormous task and practical burdens the architects and builders had taken upon themselves to attain the level of perfection we are looking for, accepting these tiny discrepancies is not too difficult.
Newport To Bermuda Race 2019, Fight For My Way Moobin Real Name, Wizard101 Square Jewel Plant, Status Of Protista, Eames Coffee Table, Sparkman & Stephens For Sale, Happy Times Tv Show, Coloring Page Of Santa's Sleigh,